What the Moon Landing Site Looks Like Through a Large Telescope
Can you see the Apollo 11 landing site with a telescope? Can you see the flag on the Moon? Did we really land on the Moon? These are some of the most common questions I get wheneve...
The Space Koala Astrophotography by Luca Bartek
Im more interested in the use of the smart scopes for observation of the lunar missions. I wish you hadn’t given up on the Dwarf 3.
00:00:00 The Big Question 00:00:34 Two Different Perspectives 00:01:08 Testing the Telescope 00:01:41 Daytime Moon Setup 00:02:27 Telescope Gear Overview 00:03:31 Understanding Magnification Limits 00:05:07 Sensor Resolution Power 00:06:34 Nighttime Observation Begins 00:06:54 Target Lunar Seas 00:07:39 Live View Focusing 00:08:27 Locating Tranquility Base 00:09:59 Image Stacking Process 00:10:39 Analyzing Stacked Results 00:11:28 Google Moon Comparison 00:11:57 Reaching Resolution Limits 00:12:40 Resolving Power Calculations 00:14:08 Atmospheric Interference Issues 00:14:52 Lunar Orbit Images 00:15:29 Historical Independent Proof 00:15:54 Human Connection Perspective 00:16:34 Future Lunar Missions 00:17:03 Final Clear Skies
Apollo 11 🚽💩🧻
Could you please clear your throat or drink some fluid before you speak That crackly dry throat thing is annoying AF
Everything we have been taught about moon exploration is a lie.
Nobody has ever been to space let alone land on the moon. So many of yall are so brainwashed
18 minutos perdidos para nada
The expression on your face was priceless when the plane passed in front of the moon. lol😁😁
So you can't see it ...
Que cabello más desordenado feo, si se lo cortará a la altura de los hombros serías muy linda.
"We cant see it, but it's there" ... and then we 'lost the original tapes of all 6 Apollo missions including the telemetry data and the ''technology'' (whatever that supposed to mean) and now 54 years later we 'need to go back to the drawing board' (Isaacman Feb 26), while we did it back then from scratch in 6 years ..." ... sure, lady ...
Have you considered actually looking into any of this at all?
"and then we 'lost the original tapes of all 6 Apollo missions including the telemetry data and the ''technology''" What a load of BS. Pathetic.
_"We cant see it, but it's there"_ We can't see it from Earth because we are 385,000 km away. How surprising. We can see it however with the probes that are orbiting Moon. The Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter has taken lots and lots of pictures from the landing sites. Probes from other countries (India, China, Japan, South Korea) have taken pictures as well. _"and then we 'lost the original tapes of all 6 Apollo missions including the telemetry data"_ We lost one set of tapes of a certain type. The videos that were on these tapes are still there on other tapes. BTW, if those telemetry data were still there the conspiracy morons wouldn't care one bit for them. Just as they always cluelessly blab about the computer power that they didn't have in the sixties and that according to their dumbo expertise wasn't enough to reach the Moon. While some nerds have published a series of nearly 50 videos on YT how they restored an original Apollo Guidance Computer, brought it back to life and now can show how the descent of an Apollo Lunar Module looked like on that computer. Do we hear anything from the Moon landing deniers about that feat? Of course not! _"and the ''technology'' (whatever that supposed to mean)"_ So can you tell us what this means? Let me guess: You can't, clueless as you are. The technology is still there, both in hardware and in drawings. There are three Saturn V still existing. The one that is on display at NASA Johnson Space Center is completely consisting of flight-certified hardware that was intended to launch with the Apollo flights that were later cancelled in 1972. _"and now 54 years later we 'need to go back to the drawing board' (Isaacman Feb 26), while we did it back then from scratch in 6 years ..."_ It wasn't "from scratch in 6 years". The Mercury and Gemini programs were necessary predecessors to the Apollo program. Without their work Apollo wouldn't have been possible. Apart from that, design needs much longer today because the safety margins that they had then are not acceptable in today's world. Just compare how long the construction of a car took in the sixties and how much it did cost then and how long it takes today and what are the costs today. Seemingly you are someone who doesn't have the slightest clue about technics and construction. _"... sure, lady ..."_ Both funny and embarrassing when an illiterate conspiracy fkster tries to engage in sarcasm.
You accents makes it difficult to understand you
Then this is a good opportunity for you to improve your English.
Incrível ,suas imagens são sensacionais, parabéns!!!
no flag there
So, you don’t understand that it’s not possible to see tiny things far, far away? 🤦♂️ (I wonder who ties the shoes for you in the morning.)
@bobmusil1458 nothing to see : you see nothing
To save time for the new folx watching....she didn't find anything....
It’s like saying don’t waste time watching Titanic, the boat sinks at the end
That is indeed a very impressive telescope that you own. You also seem to be very well versed in telescope technology. You are also extremely knowledgeable about the moon. But I have to ask a few questions number 1 why doesn't NASA with their enormous budget of a reported 80 million dollars a day do this? This would really clear things up for the many and growing number of nonbelievers out there. Number 2 why did you take so long to get to the point and lastly how much do you actually get paid for promoting NASA's propaganda?
Why doesn’t NASA do what? What I just explained for 20 minutes is physically impossible?
Thank you for standing up and being counted. Now we know you’re one of the idiots.
Funny you mention Mike Collins. All three were surprisingly silent about their mission in front of camera and Mike got grounded for the rest of the Apollo programme. Can your telescope capture an extra astronaut hitching a ride on the ladder of a lunar lander? Some people were not happy about my Collins conspiracy saying if he did a Brad Pitt (AD Astra) he would have probably made a Collins crater. But say Mike jumped off the ladder at the height of a third storey flat. One giant leap for a man, he could have been the astronaut that filmed Armstrong put that lazy foot on the lunar surface because Mike had warned he got his ass electricuted like a cowboy on an electric bull with his earlier landing. But anyway if astronauts were a thousand feet above the lunar surface could we see them on a telescope like this?
Наса все сфальшувало!
Thank you for standing up and being counted. Now we know you’re one of the idiots.
Didn't they leave some type of reflectors on the surface?
Yes they did. With a strong focused laser and corresponding detector one can measure it😊
Ok so you made a video with the title "What the Moon landing site looks like through a large telescope" only to tell us that you can't see the moon landings through your large telescope. And the only way to see the landing sites would be through a telescope in space. The comment section here is hilarious. lol